Everything you ever wanted to know about the Year 1 Phonics Check

Share this post

The Year 1 Phonics Screening Check was introduced in all English primary schools in 2012. Since then, there have been substantial improvements in Year 1 and 2 students’ decoding skills as measured by the Check, and promising signs of improvement in standardised reading assessments in later years.

After several years of sometimes vigorous debate and consistent evidence-based advocacy from researchers, educators, and parent groups, the Year 1 Phonics Check is beginning to be adopted around Australia.

  • It has been implemented in South Australian primary schools each year since 2018
  • More than 500 primary schools have joined a voluntary trial in NSW in August 2020
  • An online version has been provided to all schools by the federal government in August 2020

It should go without saying (but apparently still needs to be said) that phonics instruction is one element of an effective reading instruction program, albeit an essential one. Students also need comprehensive instruction in the language and meaning aspects of literacy. It should also be self-evident that, just like any other assessment, the stated benefits of the check derive from the judicious use of the data to inform improvements in teaching practices.

The message about the educational value of the Year 1 Phonics Check is reaching policy makers, schools, and the wider community. Below is a selection of articles and reports that provide accurate information about the Year 1 Phonics Check — what it is and isn’t, why it was developed, and what evidence exists of its benefits for students and teachers.

 

Research and evidence-based reports and articles on the Year 1 Phonics Screening Check

Year 1 phonics screening check: Pilot 2011 technical report (UK Standards and Testing Agency, 2012)

Good and bad news on the phonics screen (Bishop, 2013)

Validity and sensitivity of the phonics screening check: Implications for practice (Duff, Mengoni, Bailey, & Snowling, 2015)

Phonics screening check evaluation: Final report for the UK Department for Education. (Walker, Sainsbury, Worth, Bamforth, & Betts, 2015)

Why we use the Phonics Screening Check in Australia (Smith, 2015)

Focus on phonics: Why Australia should adopt the Year 1 Phonics Screening Check (Buckingham, 2016)

Why Australia should trial the new phonics screening check (Snow, Castles, Wheldall & Coltheart, 2016)

Facts about the phonics screening check (Buckingham, 2017)

The story of an ugly ducking: AKA phonics check furphies (Snow, 2017)

Fact-checking Misty Adoniou on the phonics check (Ashman, 2017)

Why do we need a phonics test for six year olds? (Hammond, 2017)

National Year 1 literacy and numeracy assessment: Expert advisory panel advice to the Minister ((Buckingham, Nayton, Snow, Capp, Prince, & McNamara, 2017)

Evaluation of the trial of the Year 1 Phonics Screening Check in South Australian schools (Hordacre, Moretti, & Spoehr, 2017)

Phonics developments in England from 1998 to 2018 (Chew, 2018)

Phonics myth-buster 1: “The phonics tests will be too stressful!” (Dekker, 2018)

Crying foul in the phonics debate. The influence of vested interests (Dekker, 2019)

Performance of Australian children on the English Phonics Screening Check following systematic synthetic phonics instruction in the first two years of schooling (Wheldall, Bell, Wheldall, Madelaine, & Reynolds, 2019)

The importance of early phonics improvements for predicting later reading comprehension (Double, McGrane, Stiff & Hopfenbeck, 2019)

Misinformation about the Year 1 phonics check (Buckingham, 2019)

Phonics screening check and key stage 1 assessments: England 2019 (UK Standards and Testing Agency, 2019)

Why states and territories should follow South Australia’s lead and introduce the Year 1 Phonics Check: An update (Buckingham & Wheldall, 2020)

The grass is not greener on Jeffrey Bowers’ side of the fence: Systematic phonics belongs in evidence-based reading programs (Buckingham, 2020)

‘Myths and deception’, the Australian PSC: a response to Dr Paul Gardner (Nowers, 2020)

A national intervention in teaching phonics: A case study from England (Stainthorp, 2020)

More Posts

Blog

Teacher education reform: Where will all the experts come from?

The problems with education in Australia are not new. When the first major Commonwealth government report on school quality (the ‘Karmel report) was published in 1985, there was no testing program for literacy and numeracy but employers were of the view that the basic skill levels of many school leavers were low. The first government literacy and numeracy tests were introduced in NSW in 1989 and thanks to national and international assessments introduced in the past two decades, there has been objective evidence for decades now that an unacceptable number of students are struggling with these fundamental aspects of education. Above the basic level, achievement is mediocre by international standards and has been declining. Fewer students are taking the harder maths and science subjects in senior secondary school. There are concerns that the reading and writing competency of many university students is affecting their ability to achieve academically at this level. These things are all connected and known.

Read More »
Blog

Don’t discard comprehension strategies

As greater consensus has been reached about how to teach children to decode and read words fluently, the focus of discussion among practitioners and researchers has shifted to reading comprehension. Some of this discussion has centred on the utility of teaching comprehension skills and strategies explicitly as awareness of the central role of background knowledge in reading comprehension has grown (Smith et al., 2021). The arguments against teaching comprehension skills and strategies are often framed in these ways:

Read More »
Blog

Still too many ‘instructional casualties’: A response to the Productivity Commission’s Interim Report on the National School Reform Agreement

In September, the Productivity Commission released an Interim Report from its Inquiry into the National School Reform Agreement (NSRA). The NSRA is “a joint agreement between the Commonwealth, states and territories to lift student outcomes across Australian schools. The NSRA outlines a set of strategic reforms in areas where national collaboration will have the greatest impact, builds on current national reform efforts, complements state and territory leadership and supports local implementation. Ongoing implementation of these shared commitments remains a condition of funding under the Australian Education Act 2013 (Cth) (Act).” (p. iv)

Read More »

Hi there!

Want to drop us a line?  You can get in touch by filling out the form below and we’ll get back to you as soon as possible!