Reference list

Adesope, O. O., Lavin, T., Thompson, T., & Ungerleider, C. (2011). Pedagogical strategies for teaching literacy to ESL immigrant students: a meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(Pt 4), 629–653.

Ashman, G. (2020). Structured word inquiry fails a key test. Blog post, 18 January 2020.

Barker, T. A., & Torgesen, J. K. (1995). An evaluation of computer-assisted instruction in phonological awareness with below average readers. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 13(1):89-103.

Bowers, J. S. (2020). Reconsidering the evidence that systematic phonics is more effective than alternative methods of reading instruction. Educational Psychology Review, Online first.

Bowers, S., & Bowers, P. (2008). Understanding SWI: “Structured word inquiry” or “scientific word investigation”.

Bowers, J. S., & Bowers, P. N. (2017). Beyond phonics: The case for teaching children the logic of the English spelling system. Educational Psychologist, 52, 124–141.

Bowers, P. N., & Kirby, J. R. (2010). Effects of morphological instruction on vocabulary acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23(5), 515–537.

Buckingham, J. (2016). Focus on phonics: why Australia should adopt the year 1 phonics screening check. The Centre for Independent Studies. Research Report 22.

Camilli, G., Vargan, S., & Yurecko, M. (2003). Teaching children to read: The fragile link between science and federal education policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(15), 1–51.

Camilli, G., Wolfe, M., & Smith, M. L. (2006). Meta-analysis and reading policy: Perspectives on teaching children to read. The Elementary School Journal, 107(1), 27–36.

Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19, 5-51.

Christensen, C. A. & Bowey J. A. (2005). The efficacy of orthographic rime, grapheme–phoneme correspondence, and implicit phonics approaches to teaching decoding skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(4), 327–349.

Colenbrander, D., Parsons, L., Murphy, S., Hon, Q., Bowers, J. & Davis, C. (2018). Morphological intervention for children with reading and spelling difficulties.

Department for Education. (2011). A third of children reach expected level in pilot of the phonics check.

Galuschka, K., Ise, E., Krick, K., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2014). Effectiveness of treatment approaches for children and adolescents with reading disabilities: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One, 9(2), e89900.

Hammill, D. D., & Swanson, H. L. (2006). The National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis of phonics instruction: Another point of view. The Elementary School Journal, 107(1), 17–26.

Han, I. (2010). Evidence-based reading instruction for English language learners in preschool through sixth grades: A meta-analysis of group design studies. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy,

Hatcher, P. J., Hulme, C. & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Explicit phoneme training combined with phonic reading instruction helps young children at risk of reading failure. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(2), 338-358.

Hilton, M.  (2006) Measuring standards in primary English: issues of validity and accountability with respect to PIRLS and National Curriculum test scores. British Educational Research Journal, 32:6, 817-837.

Johnston, R., McGeown, S. & Watson, J. (2011). Long-term effects of synthetic versus analytic phonics teaching on the reading and spelling ability of 10 year old boys and girls. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25(6), 1365–1384.

Joseph, B. (2019). Overcoming the odds: A study of Australia’s top performing disadvantaged schools. Research Report 39. The Centre for Independent Studies.

Levy, B., & Lysynchuk, L. (1997). Beginning word recognition: Benefits of training by segmentation and whole word methods. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 359–387.

Levy, B., Bourassa, D., & Horn, C. (1999). Fast and slow namers: Benefits of segmentation and whole word training. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73(2), 115–138.

Louden, B. (2015). High performing schools: What do they have in common? Western Australia Department of Education.

Machin, S., McNally, S., & Viarengo, M. (2018). Changing how literacy is taught: Evidence on synthetic phonics. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 10, 217–241.

McArthur, G., Castles, A., Kohnen, S., Larsen, L., Jones, K., Anandakumar, T., et al. (2015a). Sight word and phonics trainingin children with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(4):391-407.

McArthur, G., Kohnen, S., Jones, K., Eve, P., Banales, E., Larsen, L., et al. (2015b). Replicability of sight word training and phonics training in poor readers: A randomised controlled trial. PeerJ; 3:e922.

McArthur, G., Eve, P. M., Jones, K., Banales, E., Kohnen, S., Anandakumar, T., & et al. (2012). Phonics training for English speaking poor readers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 12. Article Number CD009115. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009115.pub2

McArthur, G., Sheehan, Y., Badcock, N.A., Francis, D.A., Wang, H.C., Kohnen, S., Banales, E., Anandakumar, T., Marinus, E., Castles, A. (2018). Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018, Issue 11. Article No.: CD009115.
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009115.pub3.

McGrane, J., Stiff, J., Baird, J. Lenkiet, J., & Hopfenbeck, T. (2017). Progress in International Reading Literacy Study: National report for England. UK Department for Education.

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Goh, S., & Prendergast, C. (Eds.). (2017). PIRLS 2016 Encyclopedia: Education Policy and Curriculum in Reading. Northern Ireland. Language/Reading curriculum in the fourth grade. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website:

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and itsimplications for reading instruction. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Northern Ireland Department of Education (2011). Count, Read, Succeed. A strategy to improve outcomes in literacy and numeracy.

Nuffield Foundation (n.d.). Improving literacy outcomes in struggling readers.

OFSTED (2010). Reading by six: How the best schools do it. UK Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills.

Rose, J. (2006). Independent review of the teaching of early reading. DfES Publications.

Seidenberg, M. (2017). Language at the speed of sight: How we read, why so many can’t, and what can be done about it. Basic Books.

Sherman, K. H. (2007). A Meta-analysis of interventions for phonemic awareness and phonics instruction for delayed older readers. University of Oregon, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2007, 3285626.

Suggate, S. P. (2010). Why what we teach depends on when: Grade and reading intervention modality moderate effect size. Developmental Psychology, 46(6), 1556–1579.

Suggate, S. P. (2016). A meta-analysis of the long-term effects of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, and reading comprehension interventions.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(1), 77–96.

Stanovich, K.E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading. Guilford Press.

Torgerson, C. J., Brooks, G., & Hall, J. (2006). A systematic review of the research literature on the use of phonics in the teaching of reading and spelling(DfES Research Report 711). Department for Education and Skills, University of Sheffield.

Torgerson, C., Brooks, G., Gascoine, L., & Higgins, S. (2018). Phonics: Reading policy and the evidence of effectiveness from a systematic ‘tertiary’ review. Research Papers in Education, 1-31. https://doi. org/10.1080/02671522.2017.1420816.

Walker, M., Sainsbury, M., Worth, J., Bamforth, H., & Betts, H. (2015). Phonics screening check evaluation: Final report. National Foundation forEducational Research, U.K. Department for Education.